The Construction of the Pedagogical Content Knowledge in the Training of Chemistry Teachers
Keywords:
pedagogical content knowledge, chemistry, electrochemistryAbstract
The purpose of this dissertation proposal is to study the dynamics of the construction of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) in students of the Chemistry Teacher’s Degree of the Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales of the Universidad Nacional of Mar del Plata. This work aims to make a contribution to the problem of improving curricular designs in teaching careers, generating proposals for the suggestion of a new training model. From a qualitative approach, 4 longitudinal case studies will be carried out, designing proposals that promote the construction and development of the PCK in specifc topics of Chemistry and monitoring it from the Didactic Model of Pedagogical Reasoning and Action. Various instruments will be used to “capture” the PCK; among them, the Content Representation (CoRe), and the Professional and Pedagogical experience Repertoires, (Pap-eRs). The data analysis will be developed from the identifcation of regularities or patterns and divergences in records from different techniques, through an interactive process using the constant comparative method.
References
Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30 (10), 1405–1416.
Aydin, S., Friedrichsen, P., Boz, Y., y Hanuscin, D.L. (2014). Examination of the Topic-Specifc Nature of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Teaching Electrochemical Cells and Nuclear Reactions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15 (4), 658-674.
Baxter, J. A., y Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. En J. Gess-Newsome y N. G. Lederman (Eds.). PCK and Science Education (pp. 147-161). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Carlson, J., y Daehler K. R. (2019). The Refned Consensus Model of Pedagogical Content knowledge in Science Education. En A. Hume, R. Cooper y A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Teachers´ Knowledge for Teaching Science (pp. 77-92). Singapur: Springer.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2da ed.). London, New Delhi, California, Singapore: Sage Publications.
Flick, U. (2012). Introducción a la Investigación Cualitativa. Madrid, Ed. Morata.
Garritz, A., Nieto, E., Padilla, K., Reyes Cardenas, F., y Velasco, R. (2008). Conocimiento didáctico del contenido en química. Lo que todo profesor debería poseer. Campo Abierto. 27 (1), 153-177
Gómez Rodríguez, G., Gil Flores J., y García Jiménez, E. (1996). Metodología de la Investigación Cualitativa. Granada, Ediciones Aljibe.
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Henze I., y Barendsen E., (2019). Unravelling Student Science Teachers´ pPCK Development and the Influence of Personal Factors Using Authentic Data Sources. En A. Hume, R. Cooper y A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Teachers´Knowledge for Teaching Science (pp. 201-221). Singapur: Springer.
Hume, A., Cooper, R., y Borowski, A. (2019). Repositioning Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Teachers´ Knowledge for Teaching Science. Singapur: Springer.
Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical Content Knowledge in science education: perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169-204.
Loughran, J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R., y Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through PaPeRs. Research in Science Education, 31, 289-307. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., y Berry, A. (2012). Understanding and Developing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge. (2da ed.). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., y Borko H. (1999). Nature, Sources and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teaching. En J. Gess-Newsome y N. G. Lederman (Eds.), PCK and Science Education (pp.95-132). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Martin, E., Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., Ramsden, P., y Benjamin, J. (2000) What University teachers teach and how they teach it. Instructional Science, 28(5), 387– 412.
Miles, M., Huberman, M., y Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative Data Analysis – A Methods Sourcebook (3ra. Ed.). London, New Delhi, California, Singapore: Sage Publications.
Park, S., y Oliver, J. (2008). Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a Conceptual Tool to Understand Teachers as Professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261 – 284.
Park, S., y Chen, Y. (2012). Mapping Out the Integration of the Components of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): Examples from High School Biology Classrooms. Teaching, y Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922–941.
Rollnick, M., y Mavhunga, E. (2014). PCK of teaching electrochemistry in chemistry teachers: A case in Johannesburg, Gauteng Province, South Africa. Educación Química. 25(3), 354-362.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), p. 4-14.
Stake, R. (2013). Estudios de casos cualitativos. En Denzin, N.K. y Lincoln, Y.S. (Coord.) Manual de investigación cualitativa, (pp.154-197).
Wilson, C.D., Borowski A., y Van Driel, J., (2019). Perspectives on the Future of PCK research in Science Educaction and Beyond. En Hume, A., Cooper, R., y Borowski, A. (Eds.), Repositioning Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Teachers´ Knowledge for Teaching Science (pp. 201-221). Singapur, Springer
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 María Fernanda Echeverría, María Basilisa García
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
